ZIONIST OCCUPATION REGIME FORCES BOMB 161 MOSQUES IN GAZA

Gaza City, 9 Shawwal 1435/5 August 2014 (MINA) – Israeli occupation regime forces have so far destroyed 161 mosques in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian Awqaf Minister Yousef Dois said yesterday.

He said 41 mosques were completely destroyed and 120 were partially destroyed during the war adding that a number of religious institutions have also been attacked, Middle East Monitor (MEMO) quoted by Mi’raj Islamic News Agency (MINA) as reporting, Tuesday.

Dois continued by saying Israeli occupation regime is taking advantage of the fact that the world’s attention is on Gaza and also using this to stop Muslim worshippers from gaining access to Al-Aqsa Mosque. He said rabbis are delivering provocative speeches.

“These acts are clear proofs on the continued religious persecution practiced against Muslims and their places of worship,” he said.

He called upon the Organisation of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to take serious steps to deter Israeli  occupation regime for its “crimes and violations”, which are increasing daily in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and Jerusalem.

Gaza: a humanitarian and moral crisis

As the crisis in Gaza escalates to truly critical levels, with a death toll breaching 1,830 Palestinians and rising and an 79.9% civilian mortality rate, we are overdue a serious reflection on the nature of the positions being taken by international bodies, writes Mohammad Zeidan, General Director of the Arab Association for Human Rights, HRA who is  based in Nazareth and works to promote and protect rights of the Palestinian Arab minority in Israel.

It is with grave concern that we must note the lack of human rights and international humanitarian law principles that are guiding the most recent statements from bodies including the UN, the EU Foreign Affairs Committee and those of foreign ministries around the world.

In the past three weeks the world has watched Israel launch deadly attack after deadly attack against densely populated civilian areas and infrastructures. In the course of its bloody offensive, Israel has deemed legitimate targets to be hospitals, medical centres, ambulances, press and media reporters and UN facilities, the most recent being a school used to shelter families who had been forced to abandon their homes as their neighbourhoods fell under Israeli fire.

Such attacks which fail to differentiate between civilian and military areas breach the principles of distinction and proportionality, creating unacceptable mortality and injury rates and an uninhabitable living situation within the Gaza Strip which has left residents without access to the most basic provisions including clean water, electricity and shelter.

Despite mounting casualties and mortality rates, there has thus far been a failure on behalf of the international community to implement any practical steps to curtail Israel’s aggressions, such as diplomatic, economic or military pressure. After Amnesty International launched an urgent appeal calling on the international community to stop arms sales to Israel, the United States days later agreed to provide Israel with additional ammunition.

This latest military operation is the third that Gaza has suffered through in the past five years and will soon become the bloodiest. Lack of meaningful action and empty statements which do not draw on the basic principles of human rights and international law, have done nothing but provide Israel with confidence and diplomatic cover to continue their hostilities.

Continued emphasis on Israel’s ‘right to defend itself’ and statements which focus on both sides ceasing hostilities obscure the asymmetry of the conflict. They undermine the imbalance of power between one of the most sophisticated and highly funded militaries in the world and that of a nation who have lain under a seven year blockade which has crippled all military and civilian infrastructures. Reports which fail to clearly differentiate between the numbers of civilian and military fatalities on “both sides” evade the question that the world needs to be asking itself now: ‘who is the terrorist state?’

The international community is continuing in its failure to address the origins of the problem which are rooted in over 60 years of Palestinian suffering dating back to the 1948 Nakba, the destruction of over 500 villages, the creation of millions of refugees the world over, 46 years of occupation, a seven year siege on Gaza, confiscation of land, building of settlements, and over 20 years of futile negotiations which have resulted in nothing more than an increase of ‘facts on the ground’.

Rather, the message being sent by the recent statements of the UN and EU are that human rights do not apply to Palestinians and international law doesn’t apply to Israel. This was illustrated recently by the EU’s public dissuasion of Palestinians from seeking justice through the International Criminal Court.

The international community has shown shameful hypocrisy in its failure to act on behalf of the Palestinians and to afford them protection under international law. Of the 47 members of the UN Human Rights Council, only 29 nations voted to set up a commission to launch an international, independent inquiry into human rights violations in Gaza.

Within Europe not a single EU state voted in favour of a Human Rights Council-mandated Commission of Inquiry to be sent to investigate violations of international law. It cannot be emphasised enough that this was merely an inquiry into wrong doing and did not constitute punitive measures of any form. Furthermore, since 1948 tens of UN resolutions relating to the rights of the Palestinians have gone unimplemented.

The findings of the Goldstone report which was produced after Operation Cast Lead in 2008/9 have not been acted upon and has not prevented subsequent hostilities of even greater proportions. Within Europe governments are seeking to amend domestic laws to prevent Palestinians from utilizing international jurisdiction and seeking justice through foreign courts.

The message sent by this failure to adequately and indiscriminately implement international law and human rights protection mechanisms is twofold. Firstly it sends a message to Palestinians that using peaceful and legal mechanisms to secure national and human rights is ineffective.

Secondly it tells us that the United Nations is not serious about its remit, thus undermining the entire system of international cooperation and rights protection. Sadly these failures set a dangerous precedent which will shape the actions of future victims and perpetrators around the world.

Human rights cannot under any circumstances be sacrificed for a ‘peace process’. History has shown us that there is no peace without justice and no justice without respect for human rights. To achieve sustainable peace, the international community must choose between upholding international law and universal values or continuing to maintain the law of the jungle, whereby size and strength champions over the weak to the detriment of justice and equality.

Failure to judge Israel’s actions against human rights and international humanitarian law standards and to take robust measures to prevent further abuses, will only result in the continuation of war and further civilian bloodshed whilst also providing fertile ground for extremism to breed. As recent history has shown us, extremism crosses borders and breaches continents and when this happens humanity may pay the price that Palestinians are now paying.

Facts of history: Israel admits destruction of mosques

According to a report published in the weekly supplement of Israeli daily Haaretz, Israel has admitted to the destruction of tens of mosques in the destroyed villages of 1948 during the first years of Palestinian Nakba “catastrophe”, a policy implemented by Israel to demolish Arab and Islamic history in Palestine. The orders were given directly by senior officials of the Israeli army and totally were supported by David Ben Gurion.

Miron Rapaport, the author of the report, highlighted that the complicity of senior officials in the destruction of the mosques in the 1950s, stating that among those to issue such orders was Moshe Dayan.

Of the mosques destroyed, many were more than 1000 years old, with Asqlan Mosque, Yabna mosque and Ashdod Mosque being particularly old that thus in possession of much religious and historical value.

Referring to research carried out by Israeli professor Ayal Banbanetchi, Rapaport noted that after 1948, only 160 mosques remained in the area. In the following years, this number shrank to 40, meaning that 120 were destroyed.

The report also highlights the fact that the strategy of destroying such holy buildings aimed to eradicate the rich Islamic culture and history in the area, a policy again approved at the highest echelons of the Israeli administration with Ben Gurion stating in a commentary on the operations that “we want to destroy all, we want to demolish the Islamic history.” For the author of the report, this can leave us with no doubt that the violence against such places was no spontaneous accident, but rather a deliberate policy that aimed to achieve political results.

Rapaport argues that such destruction was not limited to mosques and states that several Arab neighborhoods in the cities of Jaffa and Lud were destroyed. (T/E01/IR)

Mi’raj Islamic News Agency (MINA)