ISLAMOPHOBIA AND WESTERN MEDIA ARE THE MENACE, NOT ISLAM
Islamophobia and Western media are the menace, not Islam
by Michael Brull and MV Media staff
When British National Party head Nick Griffin went on Question Time in the UK, every other panellist launched sharp attacks on him, one after the other. The harshest attacks came from politicians: from a Liberal Democrat, to a Conservative, to a member of Labour. They all thought it important to reject such an openly racist political party and to stress that racism should have no part in their national political dialogue.
When Australiaâs equivalent show, Q&A, featured One Nationâs Ian Nelson on Monday night, the ALPâs Anna Bligh and the Coalitionâs Barnaby Joyce did not behave at all similarly. In fact, the only people who really attacked and ridiculed Nelson were in the audience.
He offered them a solemn warning: âMuslims have their own religion, they have their own mosques, they have their own sharia law, they have their own bible, the Qurâan. Which is, uh, really different than what we do.â
Mysteriously, the audience started laughing. âI donât know whatâs funny about that, I mean, itâs a serious, itâs a serious problem.â The audience erupted into louder laughter, to the indignant confusion of Nelson. Why wouldnât the Australian people listen? The Muslims have their own bible!
Nelson went on to explain that: âItâs not that they we donât like their religion, they donât like our religion.â
We? One fears that behind Nelsonâs constant invocation of âusâ is the belief that this includes not just the handful of people who vote for his party, but all (non-Muslim? White Christian Australians?).
The questioner was allowed to respond. He spoke of how Australians have spat at his (veiled) wife in the streets. âWe donât hate your religion,â he exclaimed. âJesus is our prophet. We love Jesus!â Nelson spoke more, and the audience continued to laugh at him.
Spurning such ridicule by an audience which has amazingly never even read One Nationâs policies, he advised the audience to visit his website. There we can learn of the dangers Muslims pose to âhard working and true-blue Christian Australians.â
Unsurprisingly, One Nation seems untroubled by the people who actually pose some threat to secularism in Australia. For example, those fighting for special legal privileges for religion in Australia. Leading the way are the Anglican and Catholic Churches, fighting for the right to discriminate against employees. This is not an issue over which the peak Islamic body is interesting in lobbying.
Why is One Nation interested in the imaginary threat from Sharia, but not from Church lobbyists? The answer is that they are like Reverend Fred Nile campaigning against a Muslim school. They are not secularists. They are simply intolerant Christians, crusading on behalf of the declining 64 per cent of Australians who identified as Christian in 2006.
So why the revival of interest in One Nation? I think we can find the answer in the broader political context. On February 16, Bernard Keane wrote: âItâs extraordinarily hard to believe that a number of Liberals arenât engaged in a deliberate campaign of blatant Islamophobia, and have been for some time.â
He went on to cite Scott Morrison, Gary Humphries, Kevin Andrews and Cory âban the burqaâ Bernardi. Bernardi is an âan ardent Catholicâ.
The next day, Keane was spectacularly vindicated. Lenore Taylor revealed in the Sydney Morning Herald that the âopposition immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison, urged the shadow cabinet to capitalise on the electorateâs growing concerns about âMuslim immigrationâ, âMuslims in Australiaâ and the âinabilityâ of Muslim migrants to integrate.â
Two days later, Bernardi explained that âIslam is a totalitarian, political and religious ideology.â Why? âIt tells people everything about how they need to conduct themselves, who theyâre allowed to marry and how theyâre allowed to treat other people.â Unlike Catholics, who arenât told how to behave or how to treat others.
What people fail to see here is that Islam offers you a complete and comprehensive system on dealing with every aspect of your life no matter how big or small. Islam is like a guidebook to life, and everyone needs to read it.
But we should insist: this is not just about politicians. It is a culture that makes it ok to attack the Muslim community, over and over again. And a media that makes such attacks ok, through either tacit or overt support.
For example, let us return to One Nationâs website. There, we can learn that its most highly recommended book is Among the Barbarians by Sydney Morning Herald Columnist Paul Sheehan. To take an illustration of Mr Sheehanâs style, he complained of the âheavy priceâ paid by Australians âfor the failed refugee-vetting processes in the 1970s and 1980s, when thousands of parasites who should never have been allowed into the country were approved.â [Emphasis added]
Or the other day, Eddie McGuire explained how awful it would be to live in Western Sydney, âliving up in the land of the falafelâ. This was followed by Miranda Devine impatiently writing that this âjoke⊠may have offended sensitive typesâ.
These âsensitive typesâ probably donât read the Daily Telegraph or the Herald Sun very often. The latter features such luminaries as Alan Howe. Howe once wrote that: âBy and large, Arabs and Africans are not good at democracy.
They donât do personal freedoms all that well. Many of them are fond of cruel and unusual punishmentsâ. Another time, he bragged: âWe did annihilate many Japanese. Enola Gayâs biggest passenger, Little Boy, killed 140,000 at Hiroshima in a moment; 70,000 died at Nagasaki three days later.
Itâs not fashionable to say so, but those bombs were two of the best bits of World War II.â Of course, only âsensitive typesâ would take offence at such writings. But let us return to Ms Devine. On Saturday, she wrote about the attack on Lara Logan, which she attributed to the âincreasing misogyny and subjugation of women in the Muslim worldâ. This âis the single insurmountable obstacle to democratisation.â
Not, say, the dictators of the Middle East, or the Western tear gas, tanks and bullets with which they are armed. For Devine does not appear to have written a single word in support of the Egyptian protesters. Despite this, Devine had the audacity to write that âthe assault on Logan was so unremarkable it barely rated a mentionâ in the Arab media.
That is to say, for some reason, the Arab media hasnât focused all of its attention on a white victim, like Devine. Perhaps it was distracted by an estimated 365 protesters killed, and 5500 injured. Perhaps one could say that the murder and brutalisation of Arabs âwas so unremarkable it barely rated a mentionâ in her columns.
Nor are all rape accusations treated in such manner by Devine. When it came to Assange, she wrote that the âallegations against Assange⊠make a mockery of rape.â Again, she dismissed the âdubious Swedish sex chargesâ. Actually, theyâre not dubious at all. Devine wrote that one cannot be proud of the Westâs response to the sexual assault on Logan. Nor can it be proud of her response, like so many others, to Assangeâs accusers.
Devine wrote that women protesters in Tahrir were the âexceptionâ, and that the crowd chanted that Logan was a Jew. Perhaps it is worthwhile to attend to another woman who was attacked, not given the same attention by Ms Devine. Noha Radwan, born in Egypt, is a professor of comparative literature at the University of California. She felt liberated by the âubiquitousâ female presence at the protests. âWomen and men were participating as equals in the ousting of the dictatorshipâ.
At Tahrir, âthere was no fear of sexual harassment. Even at times when space was at a premium and everyone was crammed together, the men on Tahrir went out of their way to assure the women of their safety from any form of harassment and provocation.â
âEvery day I went to Tahrir, I wore blue jeans and a light shirt with a jacket or sweater. My friends wore jeans, slacks and skirts. None of us covered our hair. On the square we sat next to women who wore western clothes and covered their hair, others who wore head scarves that were large enough to drape over their chests and back down to their waists. Some had their faces covered in the full niqab. âŠWomen physicians volunteered in the makeshift clinic on a side street.
Women lawyers gave speeches on the squareâs makeshift radio. Women were part of the âsecurityâ team searching incomers to the square to identify and exclude saboteurs carrying weapons. Women sat in front of the tanks to prevent their movement. We felt strong, empowered and united, aligned with each other and with the male protesters. Come what may, we had taken back the streets.â
However, after giving an interview to Democracy Now!, pro-Mubarak thugs attacked her, yelling âShe is with them⊠with them⊠the agentsâŠthe Americansâ. They ripped open her shirt and beat her until the army intervened and saved her.
Why did they yell she was an agent? This was the propaganda line of Mubarakâs state controlled media, which not only campaigned against journalists as âagentsâ of a foreign agenda, but also âactively tried to foment the unrest by reporting that âIsraeli spiesâ have infiltrated the city â which explains why many of the gangs who attack reporters shout âyehudi!â (âJew!â).â
Yet the story appears different when one considers the anti-Semitism and sexual abuse dealt out by pro-Mubarak thugs, backed by the West, or the absence of it by pro-democracy protesters, challenging the West. Obviously, some reporters prefer the temptation to demonise Muslims as sexist anti-Semites.
Whilst âourâ love of freedom and democracy is trumpeted in the media, it is salutary to recall Bertrand Russellâs words on those who: âhave invented what they call âWestern Values.â These are supposed to consist of toleration, respect for individual liberty, and brotherly love.
I am afraid this view is grossly unhistorical. If we compare Europe with other continents, it is marked out as the persecuting continent. Persecution only ceased after long and bitter experience of its futility; it continued as long as either Protestants or Catholics had any hope of exterminating the opposite party. The European record in this respect is far blacker than that of the Mohammedans, the Indians or the Chinese.â (T/P3/R01)
Mi’raj Islamic News Agency (MINA)
Source: http://muslimvillage.com/