US GOVT HALTS LAWSUIT AGAINST NSA

Tunis, 8 Rabiul Awal 1435 / 10 January 2014 (MINA) – Lawyers from the Justice Department have urged a judge to halt a lawsuit against the NSA’s spy programs after the judge’s previous ruling that the NSA’s collection of metadata was likely unconstitutional.

On Wednesday, government lawyers appealed to US District Court Judge Richard Leon to put court proceedings on hold for two lawsuits against the NSA filed by conservative legal activist, Larry Klayman.

Klayman has challenged the legality of the NSA’s programs that collect and store the metadata of American citizens on a massive scale. RT news media reported quoted by Mi’raj Islamic News Agency (MINA).

The lawyers argued that if the lawsuits were allowed to go further, they would lead to the disclosure of classified information which would represent a “significant risk” to national security.

Also Read:  At UNGA, Indonesia Supports Sea-Based Climate

“Plaintiffs have made clear their intentions to seek discovery of this kind of still-classified information, concerning targets and subjects, participating providers, and other operational details of the challenged NSA intelligence programs,” said the motion.

In this way, the lawyers want the lawsuits suspended until the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit hears an appeal of Judge Leon’s December-16 ruling that the NSA’s gathering of massive amounts of metadata probably went against the constitution. The US Department of Defense appealed the ruling on January 3.

In last month’s hearing, Judge Leon ruled that the gathering of metadata was likely in breach of the fourth amendment, in the first significant legal setback for the government security agency. Leon noted that the US government has failed to cite a single example of when the analysis of metadata has prevented a potential terrorist attack.

Also Read:  US Middle East Peace Plan to be Released after Ramadan

“I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism,” wrote Leon in his ruling. He added that the plaintiffs were able to show that their privacy interests “outweighed” the NSA’s harvesting of their personal data.

“The almost-Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States is unlike anything that could have been conceived in 1979,” wrote Leon, referring to a 1979 court decision that ruled Americans do not have a Fourth Amendment privacy right to phone numbers they call.

Also Read:  EU, IRAN DISCUSS PUSH FOR PEACE IN SYRIA

Since former CIA contractor-turned whistleblower, Edward Snowden, revealed classified data on the NSA’s spying antics last year, the American government has justified its espionage programs as being in the interests of national security and the fight against terrorism.

Following Judge Leon’s ruling in December, District Judge William Pauley in Manhattan ruled that the NSA’s spy programs were legal in a separate lawsuit lodged by the American Civil Liberties Union. Pauley described the surveillance programs as the “counter-punch” to terrorism and said “this blunt tool only works because it collects everything.” (T/P04/E1/mirajnews.com)

Mi’raj Islamic News Agency (MINA)

Comments: 0

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.